Skip to content

Investor update for September 2021

Value correlations to bonds yet another dislocation in a shaky market.

Given the relatively minor drawdown in equity markets recently, there seems to be a surprisingly large number of dislocations appearing in global financial markets.

We have written previously about why we believe inflation is likely to run higher for longer and the burgeoning energy crisis we’re witnessing globally seems almost certain to support this view. Central banks and global bond markets are also growing increasingly concerned, with longer-term interest rates well bid in recent weeks.

One such dislocation is the continued divergence of Growth and Value equities. Chart of the month is attributed to Goldman Sachs and highlights the correlations of global Growth & Value shares versus bonds.

From a correlation perspective, it has been difficult to discern between Value and Growth stocks for most of the past 20 years. Over this period the relationship has been firmly negative, although if we were to extend this chart back a further 40 years this negative relationship would appear as an outlier.

However, in recent months there has been a breakdown between the correlations of Value and Growth shares versus bonds. The dark blue line shows that Growth equities have more recently delivered a positive correlation to bonds, meaning that as interest rates have risen and bonds fallen, these shares have also mostly fallen. Conversely, the light blue line is showing a continued negative correlation for Value equities, meaning they have been generally appreciating during the recent interest rate spike. 

This represents a meaningful divergence from the 20 year trend, where typically the market made little distinction between Value or Growth, they were just ‘equities’. 

This has proven a boon for Value investors during the most recent mini-drawdown. The reason can be attributed to the increasing duration, or interest rate sensitivity of Growth stocks in recent years. As valuation multiples expanded for future earnings that were not expected to be delivered until much further into the future, even slight upward movements in interest rates can have a large impact on valuations. Value stocks have much less of this issue, as typically the multiples are lower, and profits are expected to be realised much sooner.

The extreme valuations of the tech and Growth sector has been well documented elsewhere, but one way to look at it is to compare current P/E multiples with their 20-year average. While Growth has always traded at a premium to the market and to Value, it remains at extreme levels.

Interestingly, the chart also shows that Value is similarly trading at a valuation premium, relative to its own history. It’s only relative to Growth that it looks a much safer bet, but for more absolute return minded investors this does raise questions regarding capital at risk.

Can Value's negative correlation to Bonds be sustained?

In the short term, with valuation levels as they are, it is certainly possible. However, with valuations for Value also at record levels, we believe this relationship has a limited horizon. It would be unusual to see value shares continue to appreciate should rates continue to march higher.

A look back to the tech bubble deflation in year 2000 highlights this point. While Growth stocks started falling in March 2000, Value stocks actually kept appreciating through to December. It was only then that Value also succumbed to gravity and started falling (although at this point a recession had also emerged, which is a risk that may also materialise this time around should rates keep climbing).

In our view this makes all equities risky, whether they be Value or Growth in colour. For investors that seek access to the longer-term returns of equities, it seems obvious from the valuations of all equities that risks are clearly higher in the current environment.

A more reliable alternative

One solution for investors looking to introduce negative correlations into their portfolios is to consider derivative strategies. Whether this be tail hedging or systematic option selling overlays, both can deliver negative correlations of far higher magnitude and with far more reliability, as they have zero reliance on Value/Growth tilts or other idiosyncratic relationships. This is our speciality at Wheelhouse, and helps explain why the risk in our Global fund is so low.

As a postscript, we’d highlight that during the tech deflationary period in year 2000-2003, systematic overlays meaningfully outperformed both Value and the market by preserving capital better and delivering regular cashflow in lieu of capital growth. Should growth have peaked, and rates continue a more normalised ascent, one could argue we may be entering a very similar environment.

Wheelhouse Global Equity Income Fund


Income over 3 years (p.a.)


Total return 3 years (p.a.)

 1 month1 year3 years (p.a.)Since inception^
Total Return(2.03%)12.35%6.97%8.59%
Risk (Beta)**n/a0.580.480.60

Performance figures are net of fees and expenses.
* Benchmark is the MSCI World Index (ex-Australia).

** Risk is defined as Beta and sourced from Morningstar Direct. Beta is represented vs the Benchmark and vs the S&P/ASX 200 Index. A Beta of 1.00 represents equivalent market risk to the comparison Index. A minimum of 12 months data is required for the calculation.

^ Inception date is 26/05/2017. Since inception figures are calculated on a p.a. basis. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Click here to read the full performance report of the Wheelhouse Global Equity Income Fund.

Wheelhouse Australian Enhanced Income Fund

Performance numbers below are based on exit prices and include the 30bps exit spread. The fund has passed the six-month hurdle and is outperforming as expected, with a very low tracking error of 0.55 for this period.

 1 month3 months6 monthsSince inception^
Total Return(0.85%)3.61%12.60%12.93%
Excess return0.68%1.34%1.67%1.59%

Performance figures are net of fees and expenses.

* Income includes cash distributions and the value of franking credits and special dividends. Cash distributions are paid quarterly.

** Benchmark is the S&P/ASX 200 Franking Credit Adjusted Daily Total Return Index (Tax-Exempt).

^ Inception date is 9/03/2021. Since inception figures are calculated on a p.a. basis. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Click here to read the full performance report of the Wheelhouse Australian Enhanced Income Fund.

New Insight: Risk Efficient Income

Recently the Wheelhouse income funds were added to leading online investment marketplace Australian Money Market. As part of the platform launch we penned a short piece on how investors can build ‘risk-efficient’ income portfolios with higher yields and minimal increases in risk.

Please click here to view the Risk Efficient income flyer.

Before you go!

Sign up to our newsletter and receive our insights and reports every month!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.